Archive for April, 2008

WHY WE ARE POOR

April 27, 2008

Why are we poor? Walden Bello offers a very convincing explanation: In The Shadow of Debt.

Main points:

  • The 7.3% growth in GDP is a fluke. It is accounted for by a decrease in imports– a warning sign of a deteriorating economy, not improving.
  • Poverty incidence is rising.
  • GMA is not the problem. She’s just a part of it.
  • From 1990 to 2005, the Philippines registered the worst growth figures in Southeast Asia. Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar are doing much better.
  • Don’t blame population. Researches show population growth slows down as economy expands.
  • Don’t blame corruption either. Endemic corruption accompanied rapid growth in many societies including the US and Europe.
  • Investment level is just too low, that’s why.
  • Indiscriminate trade liberalization has but swamped our industries leading to bankruptcies and massive layoffs. Countries which pursued strategic protectionism are faring better.
  • Lost revenue from tariff due to trade liberalization worsened fiscal deficit. The government had to scour somewhere else. Result: more taxes. Then, because most of the national budget goes to paying our debt. we could not spend more on vital infrastructure.

If the hemorrhage of payments on the foreign debt blew a hole on the expenditure side, trade liberalization, by reducing a very critical source of government revenues blew a hole on the revenue side.

  • Investors are turned off by decaying infrastructure. So they go elsewhere— to the competition.

Less the economese, it’s kind of a no-brainer, really.

…it requires no special intelligence to realize that the massive amounts of money that have gone to paying our creditors to service our constantly mounting external debt was money that could not go to development. It cannot be otherwise given that resources are finite.

Why are we poor? Because there are no jobs. How do you create jobs? Investment: no new investment, no new jobs; more investment, more jobs. Simple.

Why are investments low? Because investors are turned off by our inferior, deteriorating, insufficient infrastructure. Why deteriorating and insufficient. Because we have no money to invest there; most go to paying off our debt. Simple.

I disagree on some minor points but I’ll say my piece another time.

A ROCK STAR’S SPEECH

April 27, 2008

Commencement Address by Bono, lead singer of U2, May 17, 2004 University of Pennsylvania.

Because We Can, We Must

Bono

My name is Bono and I am a rock star. Don’t get me too excited because I use four letter words when I get excited. I’d just like to say to the parents, your children are safe, your country is safe, the FCC has taught me a lesson and the only four letter word I’m going to use today is P-E-N-N. Come to think of it ‘Bono’ is a four-letter word. The whole business of obscenity–I don’t think there’s anything certainly more unseemly than the sight of a rock star in academic robes. It’s a bit like when people put their King Charles spaniels in little tartan sweats and hats. It’s not natural, and it doesn’t make the dog any smarter.

It’s true we were here before with U2 and I would like to thank them for giving me a great life, as well as you. I’ve got a great rock and roll band that normally stand in the back when I’m talking to thousands of people in a football stadium and they were here with me, I think it was seven years ago. Actually then I was with some other sartorial problems. I was wearing a mirror-ball suit at the time and I emerged from a forty-foot high revolving lemon. It was sort of a cross between a space ship, a disco and a plastic fruit.

I guess it was at that point when your Trustees decided to give me their highest honor. Doctor of Laws, wow! I know it’s an honor, and it really is an honor, but are you sure? Doctor of Law, all I can think about is the laws I’ve broken. Laws of nature, laws of physics, laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and on a memorable night in the late seventies, I think it was Newton’s law of motion…sickness. No, it’s true, my resume reads like a rap sheet. I have to come clean; I’ve broken a lot of laws, and the ones I haven’t I’ve certainly thought about. I have sinned in thought, word, and deed. God forgive me. Actually God forgave me, but why would you? I’m here getting a doctorate, getting respectable, getting in the good graces of the powers that be, I hope it sends you students a powerful message: Crime does pay.

So I humbly accept the honor, keeping in mind the words of a British playwright, John Mortimer it was, “No brilliance is needed in the law. Nothing but common sense and relatively clean fingernails.” Well at best I’ve got one of the two of those.

But no, I never went to college, I’ve slept in some strange places, but the library wasn’t one of them. I studied rock and roll and I grew up in Dublin in the ’70s, music was an alarm bell for me, it woke me up to the world. I was 17 when I first saw The Clash, and it just sounded like revolution. The Clash were like, “This is a public service announcement”–with guitars. I was the kid in the crowd who took it at face value. Later I learned that a lot of the rebels were in it for the T-shirt. They’d wear the boots but they wouldn’t march. They’d smash bottles on their heads but they wouldn’t go to something more painful like a town hall meeting. By the way I felt like that myself until recently.

I didn’t expect change to come so slow, so agonizingly slow. I didn’t realize that the biggest obstacle to political and social progress wasn’t the Free Masons, or the Establishment, or the boot heal of whatever you consider ‘the Man’ to be, it was something much more subtle. As the Provost just referred to, a combination of our own indifference and the Kafkaesque labyrinth of ‘no’s you encounter as people vanish down the corridors of bureaucracy.

So for better or worse that was my education. I came away with a clear sense of the difference music could make in my own life, in other peoples’ lives if I did my job right. Which if you’re a singer in a rock band means avoiding the obvious pitfalls like, say, a mullet hairdo. If anyone here doesn’t know what a mullet is by the way your education’s certainly not complete, I’d ask for your money back. For a lead singer like me, a mullet is, I would suggest, arguably more dangerous than a drug problem. Yes, I had a mullet in the ’80s.

Now this is the point where the members of the faculty start smiling uncomfortably and thinking maybe they should have offered me the honorary bachelors degree instead of the full blown doctorate, (he should have been the bachelor’s one, he’s talking about mullets and stuff). If they’re asking what on earth I’m doing here, I think it’s a fair question. What am I doing here? More to the point: what are you doing here? Because if you don’t mind me saying so this is a strange ending to an Ivy League education. Four years in these historic halls thinking great thoughts and now you’re sitting in a stadium better suited for football listening to an Irish rock star give a speech that is so far mostly about himself. What are you doing here?

Actually I saw something in the paper last week about Kermit the Frog giving a commencement address somewhere. One of the students was complaining, “I worked my ass off for four years to be addressed by a sock?” You have worked your ass off for this. For four years you’ve been buying, trading, and selling, everything you’ve got in this marketplace of ideas. The intellectual hustle. Your pockets are full, even if your parents’ are empty, and now you’ve got to figure out what to spend it on.

Well, the going rate for change is not cheap. Big ideas are expensive. The University has had its share of big ideas. Benjamin Franklin had a few, so did Justice Brennen and in my opinion so does Judith Rodin. What a gorgeous girl. They all knew that if you’re gonna be good at your word if you’re gonna live up to your ideals and your education, its’ gonna cost you.

So my question I suppose is: What’s the big idea? What’s your big idea? What are you willing to spend your moral capital, your intellectual capital, your cash, your sweat equity in pursuing outside of the walls of the University of Pennsylvania?

There’s a truly great Irish poet his name is Brendan Kennelly, and he has this epic poem called the Book of Judas, and there’s a line in that poem that never leaves my mind, it says: “If you want to serve the age, betray it.” What does that mean to betray the age?

Well to me betraying the age means exposing its conceits, it’s foibles; it’s phony moral certitudes. It means telling the secrets of the age and facing harsher truths.

Every age has its massive moral blind spots. We might not see them, but our children will. Slavery was one of them and the people who best served that age were the ones who called it as it was–which was ungodly and inhuman. Ben Franklin called it what it was when he became president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society.

Segregation. There was another one. America sees this now but it took a civil rights movement to betray their age. And 50 years ago the U.S. Supreme Court betrayed the age May 17, 1954, Brown vs. Board of Education came down and put the lie to the idea that separate can ever really be equal. Amen to that.

Fast forward 50 years. May 17, 2004. What are the ideas right now worth betraying? What are the lies we tell ourselves now? What are the blind spots of our age? What’s worth spending your post-Penn lives trying to do or undo? It might be something simple.

It might be something as simple as our deep down refusal to believe that every human life has equal worth. Could that be it? Could that be it? Each of you will probably have your own answer, but for me that is it. And for me the proving ground has been Africa.

Africa makes a mockery of what we say, at least what I say, about equality and questions our pieties and our commitments because there’s no way to look at what’s happening over there and it’s effect on all of us and conclude that we actually consider Africans as our equals before God. There is no chance.

An amazing event happened here in Philadelphia in 1985–Live Aid–that whole We Are The World phenomenon the concert that happened here. Well after that concert I went to Ethiopia with my wife, Ali. We were there for a month and an extraordinary thing happened to me. We used to wake up in the morning and the mist would be lifting we’d see thousands and thousands of people who’d been walking all night to our food station where we were working. One man–I was standing outside talking to the translator–had this beautiful boy and he was saying to me in Amharic, I think it was, I said I can’t understand what he’s saying, and this nurse who spoke English and Amharic said to me, he’s saying will you take his son. He’s saying please take his son, he would be a great son for you. I was looking puzzled and he said, “You must take my son because if you don’t take my son, my son will surely die. If you take him he will go back to Ireland and get an education.” Probably like the ones we’re talking about today. I had to say no, that was the rules there and I walked away from that man, I’ve never really walked away from it. But I think about that boy and that man and that’s when I started this journey that’s brought me here into this stadium.

Because at that moment I became the worst scourge on God’s green earth, a rock star with a cause. Christ! Except it isn’t the cause. Seven thousand Africans dying every day of preventable, treatable disease like AIDS? That’s not a cause, that’s an emergency. And when the disease gets out of control because most of the population live on less than one dollar a day? That’s not a cause, that’s an emergency. And when resentment builds because of unfair trade rules and the burden of unfair debt, that are debts by the way that keep Africans poor? That’s not a cause, that’s an emergency. So–We Are The World, Live Aid, start me off it was an extraordinary thing and really that event was about charity. But 20 years on I’m not that interested in charity. I’m interested in justice. There’s a difference. Africa needs justice as much as it needs charity.

Equality for Africa is a big idea. It’s a big expensive idea. I see the Wharton graduates now getting out the math on the back of their programs, numbers are intimidating aren’t they, but not to you! But the scale of the suffering and the scope of the commitment they often numb us into a kind of indifference. Wishing for the end to AIDS and extreme poverty in Africa is like wishing that gravity didn’t make things so damn heavy. We can wish it, but what the hell can we do about it?

Well, more than we think. We can’t fix every problem–corruption, natural calamities are part of the picture here–but the ones we can we must. The debt burden, as I say, unfair trade, as I say, sharing our knowledge, the intellectual copyright for lifesaving drugs in a crisis, we can do that. And because we can, we must. Because we can, we must. Amen.

This is the straight truth, the righteous truth. It’s not a theory, it’s a fact. The fact is that this generation–yours, my generation–that can look at the poverty, we’re the first generation that can look at poverty and disease, look across the ocean to Africa and say with a straight face, we can be the first to end this sort of stupid extreme poverty, where in the world of plenty, a child can die for lack of food in it’s belly. We can be the first generation. It might take a while, but we can be that generation that says no to stupid poverty. It’s a fact, the economists confirm it. It’s an expensive fact but, cheaper than say the Marshall Plan that saved Europe from communism and fascism. And cheaper I would argue than fighting wave after wave of terrorism’s new recruits. That’s the economics department over there, very good.

It’s a fact. So why aren’t we pumping our fists in the air and cheering about it? Well probably because when we admit we can do something about it, we’ve got to do something about it. For the first time in history we have the know how, we have the cash, we have the lifesaving drugs, but do we have the will?

Yesterday, here in Philadelphia, at the Liberty Bell, I met a lot of Americans who do have the will. From arch-religious conservatives to young secular radicals, I just felt an incredible overpowering sense that this was possible. We’re calling it the ONE campaign, to put an end to AIDS and extreme poverty in Africa. They believe we can do it, so do I.

I really, really do believe it. I just want you to know, I think this is obvious, but I’m not really going in for the warm fuzzy feeling thing, I’m not a hippie, I do not have flowers in my hair, I come from punk rock, The Clash wore army boots not Birkenstocks. I believe America can do this! I believe that this generation can do this. In fact I want to hear an argument about why we shouldn’t.

I know idealism is not playing on the radio right now, you don’t see it on TV, irony is on heavy rotation, the knowingness, the smirk, the tired joke. I’ve tried them all out but I’ll tell you this, outside this campus–and even inside it–idealism is under siege beset by materialism, narcissism and all the other isms of indifference. Baggism, Shaggism. Raggism. Notism, graduationism, chismism, I don’t know. Where’s John Lennon when you need him.

But I don’t want to make you cop to idealism, not in front of your parents, or your younger siblings. But what about Americanism? Will you cop to that at least? It’s not everywhere in fashion these days, Americanism. Not very big in Europe, truth be told. No less on Ivy League college campuses. But it all depends on your definition of Americanism.

Me, I’m in love with this country called America. I’m a huge fan of America, I’m one of those annoying fans, you know the ones that read the CD notes and follow you into bathrooms and ask you all kinds of annoying questions about why you didn’t live up to thatŠ.

I’m that kind of fan. I read the Declaration of Independence and I’ve read the Constitution of the United States, and they are some liner notes, dude. As I said yesterday I made my pilgrimage to Independence Hall, and I love America because America is not just a country, it’s an idea. You see my country, Ireland, is a great country, but it’s not an idea. America is an idea, but it’s an idea that brings with it some baggage, like power brings responsibility. It’s an idea that brings with it equality, but equality even though it’s the highest calling, is the hardest to reach. The idea that anything is possible, that’s one of the reasons why I’m a fan of America. It’s like hey, look there’s the moon up there, lets take a walk on it, bring back a piece of it. That’s the kind of America that I’m a fan of.

In 1771 your founder Mr. Franklin spent three months in Ireland and Scotland to look at the relationship they had with England to see if this could be a model for America, whether America should follow their example and remain a part of the British Empire.

Franklin was deeply, deeply distressed by what he saw. In Ireland he saw how England had put a stranglehold on Irish trade, how absentee English landlords exploited Irish tenant farmers and how those farmers in Franklin’s words “lived in retched hovels of mud and straw, were clothed in rags and subsisted chiefly on potatoes.” Not exactly the American dream…

So instead of Ireland becoming a model for America, America became a model for Ireland in our own struggle for independence.

When the potatoes ran out, millions of Irish men, women and children packed their bags got on a boat and showed up right here. And we’re still doing it. We’re not even starving anymore, loads of potatoes. In fact if there’s any Irish out there, I’ve breaking news from Dublin, the potato famine is over you can come home now. But why are we still showing up? Because we love the idea of America.

We love the crackle and the hustle, we love the spirit that gives the finger to fate, the spirit that says there’s no hurdle we can’t clear and no problem we can’t fix. (sound of helicopter) Oh, here comes the Brits, only joking. No problem we can’t fix. So what’s the problem that we want to apply all this energy and intellect to?

Every era has its defining struggle and the fate of Africa is one of ours. It’s not the only one, but in the history books it’s easily going to make the top five, what we did or what we did not do. It’s a proving ground, as I said earlier, for the idea of equality. But whether it’s this or something else, I hope you’ll pick a fight and get in it. Get your boots dirty, get rough, steel your courage with a final drink there at Smoky Joe’s, one last primal scream and go.

Sing the melody line you hear in your own head, remember, you don’t owe anybody any explanations, you don’t owe your parents any explanations, you don’t owe your professors any explanations. You know I used to think the future was solid or fixed, something you inherited like an old building that you move into when the previous generation moves out or gets chased out.

But it’s not. The future is not fixed, it’s fluid. You can build your own building, or hut or condo, whatever; this is the metaphor part of the speech by the way.

But my point is that the world is more malleable than you think and it’s waiting for you to hammer it into shape. Now if I were a folksinger I’d immediately launch into “If I Had a Hammer” right now get you all singing and swaying. But as I say I come from punk rock, so I’d rather have the bloody hammer right here in my fist.

That’s what this degree of yours is, a blunt instrument. So go forth and build something with it. Remember what John Adams said about Ben Franklin, “He does not hesitate at our boldest Measures but rather seems to think us too irresolute.”

Well this is the time for bold measures. This is the country, and you are the generation. Thank you.

LINK

THE EARTH RISING

April 24, 2008

Moonlings will be awed by this sight as earthlings are by the moon.

Captured by the robotic Kaguya spacecraft currently in orbit around Earth’s Moon.

From www.astronomy-pictures.net

AN AMAZING SUNSET

April 23, 2008

As it is described here:

A scene you will probably never get to see, so take a moment and enjoy God at work at the North Pole.

This is the sunset at the North Pole with the moon at its closest point. And you also see the sun below the moon.

An amazing photo and not one easily duplicated.

WE ARE SINGERS

April 23, 2008

We are singers.  Make no mistake about it.

RICE

April 22, 2008

I call myself Ricelander, but I have yet to write about the present rice crisis.  How ironic.

Anyway, just minutes ago, I left a comment on Ricky Carandang’s blog.  His newest entry Why Rice is So Expensive is enlightening.  Basically, what he’s saying is, after being burned on real estate speculation following the subprime crisis in the US, speculative money has turned to chasing international commodities like rice among others, hence the spiraling price of this staple product.

And so there’s a bad mood prevailing these days because as a Filipino, rice is everything.  We can’t eat without rice.   A meal without rice is no meal at all. A cut on the usual serving is an undue aggravation. Besides, bulalo, kare-kare, pinakbet or adobo do not go well with, say, bread or noodles.  And for those who live in scarcity, rice could go with just salt, or patis to survive.

But is it all bad? This is what I wrote:

There’s an upside to this. High prices are incentives to produce and a disincentive to wastefulness. Rice farming is a back-breaking job (I should know, I come from the farms, and as my handle would reveal) but you wonder why a farmer gets only so little for all his troubles when he goes to the market to sell.

My father, a retired government employee, was a part-time farmer.  The small patches of land he had inherited from his old man, he planted with rice during rainy seasons.  As boys growing up, my brothers and I had to learn the rudiments of farming first hand just as soon as we were big enough for the carabao and the plow. That planting rice is never fun, as the folk song says is very true.   The oppressive heat of the sun, the rain, all that arduous work, all that plodding, day in and day out.  As a small boy I remember being always the butt of joke during planting season because I got left behind in the lineup all the time— floating seedlings, crooked lines and all.  Was never good at it.  I was sent to an agricultural secondary school partly I think to force the issue.  Farming was of course part of the curriculum.  First year and second year, we each got a small plot to plant with vegetables.  We sold our produce by ourselves, going house to house.  By third year we were grouped by three and each group was assigned a farm lot to till for rice.  We had a good harvest on the first year.  By fourth year, our group had the worst because we were assigned a lot where water cuts through.  I cried sabotage.  Anyway, It was fun while it lasted.

In any case, I never liked farming, at least, as a means of livelihood.  You sweat so much for only so much an earning.  My father maintained his farm for self-subsistence not for selling.  And he loved farming.  No son of his grew up to share this passion, though.  What I know is: either you love it or you have no choice.  Backbreaking work under the weather for so little do not inspire affection no matter how you look at it.    You make a living out of farming, you’ll know first hand what injustice means— when you go sell your produce and you discover that, for all the hard work, that is all it could fetch.

Things could be changing.

A friend left his work by force of circumstance.  He turned to farming with his earning from earlier stint as OFW.  This season he planted corn.  He’s optimistic.  Corn price was picking up as he was starting to harvest.  He estimated a net of sixty thousand pesos at least for that patch of land alone.  Not bad a motivation to keep a new career. (I kidded him: “you can start another family, eh?”) Nearby, another friend who was in farming years earlier is getting fresh encouragements.  He’s earning far more now than when he was just starting or so he claims.  Price is good.  Some months ago, I caught up with the two of them having conversations how things are going in the farming business.   I felt an upbeat mood.  They were talking of a farmer next town who made quite a haul with his eggplants.  As a  young man growing up with farmers, when talk went that way, it was always depressing.

This is what I see: when food gets scarce, farmers get their just due.  They become important.  We put them in their proper places in the right order of things.  They displace professions making hay from hot air.

(Image from: www.patnadaily.com)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY MR. BUNYE!

April 20, 2008

Oh, ’twas your birthday yesterday, Sir. Happy, happy birthday! May you have a long life and a memory even more enduring.

Remember this picture? May you never ever forget.

Will somebody please build him a monument to freeze this defining moment in history. Name it Bunye’s Pride.

MOORE’S LAW TRIUMPHS

April 20, 2008

Moore’s Law which says computing power will double every two years appears to be holding just yet.

Scientists Build World’s Smallest Transistor…

British researchers have unveiled the world’s smallest transistor, which measures one atom thick and ten atoms across.

The newly announced transistor is more than three times smaller than the 32 nanometer transistors at the cutting edge of silicon-based electronics.

“It’s molecular electronics with the standard top-down approach which can be used in any semiconductor factory,” said Kostya Novoselov, a researcher at the University of Manchester and a co-author of a new paper on the transistor in the journal Science.

Transistors form the logic gates that underpin computing. Finding new ways to make them smaller is key to the continuation of Moore’s Law, which holds that the number of transistors on a chip will double every two years. That doubling translates into performance gains for computers. While expected improvements to processes and materials, namely silicon, seem likely to keep the law going for the next ten years, even Gordon Moore questions technology’s ability to keep pace after that.

This new transistor may extend Moore’s Law for a while longer.

The transistor is made out of graphene, a new material exactly one-atom thick that was discovered by Novoselov’ s research team in 2004.

Imagine a computer as huge as a 300-story building with a floor area of four football fields.

A HEIGHTENING SENSE OF IDIOCY

April 16, 2008

Today, the Supreme Court defers action on the petition filed by the Senate re first ruling on Mr. Romulo Neri’s invocation of executive privilege…

…and orders Mr. Romulo Neri to comment on the petition.

Ten days for Neri to reply; ten days too for the Senate for later response.

Twenty days more at least for chewing on each others’ nails.  Hey, it’s like we’re sending the first Filipino to the moon, huh?

Hmm, what will Neri say or add? Indeed, how could one further expound on an idiocy without any added scrape on his honor and dignity? Or before anyone thinks of erecting a statue of him entitled The Man Who Won’t Answer Three Questions Because He Fears A War With China?

This is tiring and exasperating. but I will cut and paste from another entry:

Three questions Mr. Romulo Neri would not want asked of him by the Senate in the ongoing NBN-ZTE scandal Senate inquiry:

1. did the President follow up on the NBN deal? 2. was Neri asked to prioritize the project? 3. did Ms Arroyo give the go-ahead to Neri to approve the deal in spite of the alleged bribery?

His reason— hold your breath!— it might impair the diplomatic relations with China!

Jesus Christ!  I’ve been searching high and low, far and wide— as to why a no or a yes could raise the hackles of China because as an admirer of Chinese civilization, something here just don’t feel right.  If I were a Chinese official, I could only infer someone’s making a scarecrow of my country China, and we ought to file a protest posthaste.

What followed was another idiocy, of course: SC upholds Neri!— hahahahahaha!— which makes it even more monumental…!

Susmaryosep! A bar flunkie could be forgiven— but SC magistrates?

Oh, well,… if anything, see how a lie develops from first level idiocy quite harmless, when subtle maneuvers were yet okay, and so on… and how it gets progressively worse in stages as it goes,  as when crap starts dripping from your nose and mouth and pores, like pus, and you wouldn’t even mind.

Forgive me, but I trade reason with reason, with insult, insult.

Neri’s invocation, ladies and gentlemen, is a naked insult to common sense– forget intelligence!

As for the SC?

So sad. So very, very sad!  For as it is, we have reduced our nation’s intellectuals into pondering on three stupid questions.  This while some nations are pondering on how to land a man on Mars.

What retards we have become!

Related entries:

Rocket Science of Neri’s Executive Privilege

Neri’s Complicated Questions

Three Questions

Romulo Neri, the Economist

“WHERE IS WALDO?”

April 14, 2008

Where’s Waldo was the first Waldo video game. The product was loosely based on the book Where’s Waldo. The player’s goal is to find Waldo in various pictures in order to progress through the game.

That’s Wikipedia’s description of the game. Did not play the game as as a kid so no idea about it.

Anyway, a Canadian artist is reinventing the game. She has a project Where On Earth Is Waldo? On a rooftop in Canada, she constructed a 55-foot long Waldo in his signature striped sweater, cap, cane, and eyeglasses on sheets of painted vinyl. The idea is to challenge all interested to locate where on earth it is using Google Earth.

There’s no pot prize, though. For now, at least.

SYMPTOMS

April 14, 2008

One man is in prison, one man is free.

Sometimes, all you need to see in a man if he’s healthy or ill is his face.  It tells you all.

Sometimes, all you need to see if a society is healthy or ill are the faces of its good men and its rascals— and where you find them.

In a society, the bad guys are the viruses; its good guys, the immune system.  In a human, when viruses roam free and his immune system down, he is sick.  In a society, it is the same.

This country is sick.

NATURE IS BEST TEACHER

April 11, 2008

Scientists are taking their hints from nature’s genius.

Said Jay Harman, a scientist and entrepreneur:

If you want to look for things to be done in a better way, you’ve got to look for who’s the best teacher, who’s done it best… Well, nature’s done it best: untold experiments with an open research budget. Nature’s got it down.

This idea is not new at all.  Many inventions took their cue from nature.  Only, the interest in this field is becoming more widespread.  And they call it now Biomimicry.

“It’s beginning to be de rigueur for people to ask: How have other organisms solved this problem?” said Janine Benyus, who coined the word biomimicry in her 1997 book, “Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature.” By then a few designs inspired by nature had already reached the mass market. Alexander Graham Bell studied the middle ear as part of his research in designing the telephone, and in 1948 Swiss naturalist George de Mestral dreamed up the idea for Velcro when he and his dog returned from a hike covered with burrs. One of the first known biomimics was Leonardo da Vinci, whose “flying machine” sketches were based on bird wings, an idea the Wright brothers later made use of in the first airplane.

Harman tells about his epiphany:

“As I was swimming along the reef, waves would come and I’d grab hold of seaweed so that I wouldn’t be pulled onto the reef, and the seaweeds would break off, because they’re quite fragile. And yet, time and time again, even in the most violent storms, I noticed these seaweeds wouldn’t break off even with these huge waves coming past, so what’s happening? Well, all these seaweeds were changing their shape to let the force go past. One day it clicked: They’re all changing to the same path, and it happens to be the same path as when you pull the plug out of your bath and you get that whirlpool.”

The whirlpool turns out to be the path of least resistance, and its shape, a specific type of spiral, can be found in tornadoes, puffs of smoke, lilies, eyelashes, pinecones, the hollow of a wave, abalone shells, even in the movement of our solar system. Turns out that straight lines – so revered by science and technology for efficiency – have no status in nature. “Nature uses an organizing principle – it never uses a straight line,” Harman said. “I’ve never seen any evidence anywhere of a straight line in nature – nothing. Your cardiovascular system: 60,000 miles long and no straight pipes, and it’s far more efficient than anything humans have ever dreamt of.”

It is somewhat an echo of Ralph Waldo Emerson: the laws of the world are few, they just repeat themselves in as many ways in different dimensions. Observe nature and find analogies.  It works too in the social sciences, but that’s for another entry…

ROCKET SCIENCE AND NERI’S EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

April 10, 2008

How do you write a hundred-page essay explaining why one plus one is equal to two?

Or need we consult rocket science in divining the wisdom of the SC decision on Neri’s petition for executive privilege?

I go over it again not to refresh my mind– stupid things cling to memory like a leech– but to call attention to the stark obviousness of it all.

Here:

Mr. Romulo Neri went to the Supreme Court to prevent the Senate from asking him three questions, yes,  three questions! Here they are, as clear as crystal, all three requiring one-syllable answers:

1. did the President follow up on the NBN deal? 2. was he asked to prioritize the project? 3. did Ms Arroyo give the go-ahead to him to approve the deal in spite of the alleged bribery?

Mr. Romulo Neri does not want the Senators asking him those questions.  His reason?— drum rolls, please— answering them could imperil the diplomatic relations between the Philippines and China!

Read again if you do not feel your senses assaulted by knife and dagger.

You go to the Supreme Court for that!? Jesus Christ! what has the world come to, Mr. Romulo Neri, chairman of the Commission on Higher Education!

Hey, anyway,  it was yet to be resolved by the Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court is home to the country’s best legal minds.  They should see the obvious from a mile away.

But, oh, don’t look now, just when you thought the level of ridiculousness could go no higher in the home of the land’s best legal minds, the Supreme Court upholds Neri!

Diyos na mahabagin!

So the Philippine Senate is compelled to write the equivalent of a one-hundred-page essay explaining why one plus one is equal to two with an appeal not to sense of logic but to kindness.

And this is the Court of Last Resort!

This is insane.

“KEN LEE”

April 5, 2008

This one lacks description. You just watch it. For laughs.


A STORY

April 5, 2008

Picked this up from Abe Margallo in a comment thread over at MLQ3. Have encountered this somewhere before. Think it’s a good idea to put it here.

An American investment banker was at the pier of a small coastal Mexican village when a small boat with just one fisherman docked. Inside the small boat were several large yellowfin tuna. The American complimented the Mexican on the quality of his fish and asked how long it took to catch them.

The Mexican replied, “only a little while.”

The American then asked why didn’t he stay out longer and catch more fish?

The Mexican said he had enough to support his family’s immediate needs.

The American then asked, “but what do you do with the rest of your time?”

The Mexican fisherman said, “I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take siestas with my wife, Maria, stroll into the village each evening where I sip wine, and play guitar with my amigos. I have a full and busy life.”

The American scoffed, “I am a Harvard MBA and could help you. You should spend more time fishing and with the proceeds, buy a bigger boat. With the proceeds from the bigger boat, you could buy several boats, eventually you would have a fleet of fishing boats. Instead of selling your catch to a middleman you would sell directly to the processor, eventually opening your own cannery. You would control the product, processing, and distribution. You would need to leave this small coastal fishing village and move to Mexico City, then LA and eventually New York City, where you will run your expanding enterprise.”

The Mexican fisherman asked, “But, how long will this all take?”

To which the American replied, “15 – 20 years.”

“But what then?” Asked the Mexican.

The American laughed and said, “That’s the best part. When the time is right you would announce an IPO and sell your company stock to the public and become very rich, you would make millions!”

“Millions – then what?”

The American said, “Then you would retire. Move to a small coastal fishing village where you would sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siestas with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigos.”

WARM WELCOME, PLAYBOY!

April 2, 2008

A NOKIA MADE OF TRASH

April 2, 2008

As described by Danny Dumas, Gadget Lab, Wired Blog Network:

This is the Nokia Remade, a concept cell phone made from completely recycled materials… it looks like a miniature corrugated roof. Whatever Rosarch shape you think it takes, the handset is made from 100 percent recycled materials…

CELLPHONES, FUTURE GENERATION

April 2, 2008

If you think you have the glitziest cellphone today, that won’t take long— cellphones will get a lot smarter and cooler very shortly.

Here, watch out for the next big new applications:

voice controls                             

faster browsers

on-line digital storage

live video sending phone to phone

surveillance

advanced games

3d maps

mobile social networking

Welcome to max-speed obsolescence era.

(Image from: zedomax.com/blog)