Skip to content


May 8, 2008

What’s wrong with this country? It’s the hot topic these days; let me join the fray.

One word: MONOPOLY.

Five percent of families owning eighty-five percent of the entire country– that is monopoly. When you have the remainder, 95%, fighting over the crumbs, 15%– that explains the rest of the problem.

So, what is wrong with monopoly? Everything— let alone the matter about this terrible social inequity. The arguments are long but essentially it is this: In a monopoly, you lose all your concern for things like efficiency, merit, quality, productivity, good governance, integrity, and the like. And why not? You are secure; you have no competition from within; you can do whatever you want. Remember PLDT, the giant, before the deregulation of telecom? Or Meralco now? Or Napocor? That is so in business enterprises, that is so in any other organizations; that is so in all its macrocosms: monopoly behaves the same way it does wherever it appears in nature or in political or economic systems and inflicts the same afflictions in corresponding manner.

In the discussion about another but connected issue, Federalism, on a comment thread over at MLQ3, I wrote the following:

Federalism is a bad bad idea.

Federal governments were first independent states before they agreed to form a federation. The direction is from separate units to one whole; tendency is towards integration Pimentel and company are proposing to create states from one small nation. The direction is reverse: from one whole to separate units; tendency is toward disintegration.

Tongue’s Wrath has a term: reverse engineering.

You see, Filipinos are in a perpetual quarrel about so many things; now they think putting them in separate states like they do squabbling siblings in separate rooms will do the trick. Wrong. I said:

Break up the monopoly of the oligarchs to multiply economic opportunities not break up the republic to multiply political opportunities. In the absence of widespread economic opportunities, there is disunity as people quarrel of the little that is left. He who would be a manager/supervisor of a business firm sees opportunity in becoming a mayor instead…. Who is otherwise a CEO of a conglomerate, he would be a state official sucking the blood out of the national coffer.

In political oratories, you often hear speakers extolling Filipinos “we are one family”. The analogy is correct, if a cliche. Trouble is we often see only the romantic and convenient outward parallelisms. You wonder why the more important correspondence a nation has to a family are easily overlooked.

In a dining table, when one sibling takes the choice cuts and the other siblings get the bones and the father just looks on, you know what sort of trouble will follow. The same thing in society: you take 85% of the resources for the few of you and leave the rest of the crumbs for the multitude, why the hell you wonder why there is so much grumbling?

The one sibling who got the bone, packed his bags and left home in a huff, suffocated, is the diaspora of OFWs who saw breathing space and opportunity elsewhere far far away.

The sibling who cornered the choice cuts and who always grabs the most in everything because he is big and packs a deadly wallop when frustrated is the oligarchic interest and the choice cuts are the resources and properties it now monopolizes.

The rebel son who stayed behind, the black sheep who always comes home drunk, who breaks the glasses, who steals his mother’s jewelries, sells furnitures, wipes off his dirty shoes on the carpet, who slams the door—he is the undisciplined drivers, the pot-bellied cops, the swindlers in the market, the uninspired teachers, the conniving politicians, the corrupt bureaucrats, the poor who reproduce like pigs, and so on and so forth, they who populate the land.

And this thing called federalism?— they are rooms the father intends to build for his quareling sons because he would or could do nothing to correct the inequity in his home.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. December 7, 2013 8:53 am

    hello 🙂 i’ve been trying to understand the 4.5php hike, googling epira, meralco, wesm, erc, and now wondering if youve blogged on the electricity problem, which is so complicated. thought of you bec of your comment on my epira, epic fail 2012 so i googled you too and found this. yes, nuclear family as metaphor, i couldnt find the words, but you have na pala! galing.

    • February 27, 2014 9:03 am

      Hi Miss Angela, thanks hahaha. sorry for missing this. see, I am logging in on my blog only now after so many months now. And hey I have forgotten all about this entry, 2008 pa pala back when I was masipag pa.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: